People tend to believe their spreadsheets are more accurate than they really are.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2006)
Spreadsheets are commonly used and commonly flawed.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2008)
Spreadsheet errors... a great, often unrecognised, risk to corporate decision making & financial integrity.
Chadwick (2002)
It is irrational to expect large error-free spreadsheets.
Panko (2013)
A significant proportion of spreadsheets have severe quality problems.
Ayalew (2007)
Spreadsheets... pose a greater threat to your business than almost anything you can imagine.
Howard (2005)
Despite overwhelming and unanimous evidence... companies have continued to ignore spreadsheet error risks.
Panko (2014)
The software that end users are creating... is riddled with errors.
Burnett & Myers (2014)
It is now widely accepted that errors in spreadsheets are both common and potentially dangerous.
Nixon & O'Hara (2010)
Spreadsheets are often hard, if not impossible, to understand.
Mireault & Gresham (2015)
A lot of decisions are being made on the basis of some bad numbers.
Ross (1996)
Overconfidence is one of the most substantial causes of spreadsheet errors.
Sakal, et al (2015)
1% of all formulas in operational spreadsheets are in error.
Powell, Baker, & Lawson (2009)
Spreadsheets contain errors at an alarmingly high rate.
Abraham, et al (2005)
Spreadsheets are the most popular live programming environments, but they are also notoriously fault-prone.
Hermans & van der Storm (2015)
The results given by spreadsheets are often just wrong.
Sajaniemi (1998)
Spreadsheets are dangerous to their authors and others.
Durusau & Hunting (2015)
Spreadsheets are easy to use and very hard to check.
Chen & Chan (2000)
Spreadsheet errors are still the rule rather than the exception.
Nixon & O'Hara (2010)
Spreadsheets are more fault-prone than other software.
Kulesz & Ostberg (2013)
The untested spreadsheet is as dangerous and untrustworthy as an untested program.
Price (2006)
Developing an error-free spreadsheet has been a problem since the beginning of end-user computing.
Mireault (2015)
Spreadsheets can be viewed as a highly flexible programming environment for end users.
Abreu, et al (2015)
94% of the 88 spreadsheets audited in 7 studies have contained errors.
Panko (2008)
The issue is not whether there is an error but how many errors there are and how serious they are.
Panko (2007)
...few incidents of spreadsheet errors are made public and these are usually not revealed by choice.
Kruck & Sheetz (2001)
Every study that has looked for errors has found them... in considerable abundance.
Panko & Halverson (1996)
Most executives do not really check or verify the accuracy or validity of [their] spreadsheets...
Teo & Tan (1999)
Programmers exhibit unwarranted confidence in the correctness of their spreadsheets.
Krishna, et al (2001)
Even obvious, elementary errors in very simple, clearly documented spreadsheets are... difficult to find.
Galletta, et al (1993)
Spreadsheet errors have resulted in huge financial losses.
Abraham & Erwig (2007)
Spreadsheets are notoriously error-prone.
Cunha, et al (2011)
Research on spreadsheet errors is substantial, compelling, and unanimous.
Panko (2015)
Spreadsheets are alarmingly error-prone to write.
Paine (2001)
60% of large companies feel 'Spreadsheet Hell' describes their reliance on spreadsheets.
Murphy (2007)
Errors in spreadsheets are as ubiquitous as spreadsheets themselves.
Colbenz (2005)
Untested spreadsheets are riddled with errors.
Miller (2005)
Studies have shown that there is a high incidence of errors in spreadsheets.
Csernoch & Biro (2013)
The quality and reliability of spreadsheets is known to be poor.
Bishop & McDaid (2007)
Never assume a spreadsheet is right, even your own.
Raffensperger (2001)
Your spreadsheets may be disasters in the making.
Caulkins, Morrison, & Weidemann (2006)
Spreadsheet errors are pervasive, stubborn, ubiquitous and complex.
Irons (2003)
Errors in spreadsheets... result in incorrect decisions being made and significant losses incurred.
Beaman, et al (2005)
Spreadsheet shortcomings can significantly hamper an organization's business operation.
Reschenhofer & Matthes (2015)
Every study, without exception, has found error rates much higher than organizations would wish to tolerate.
Panko (1999)
Spreadsheets have a notoriously high number of faults.
Rust, et al (2006)
Spreadsheet development must embrace extensive testing in order to be taken seriously as a profession.
Bock (2016)
Spreadsheets are extraordinarily and unacceptably prone to error.
Dunn (2010)
Most large spreadsheets have dozens or even hundreds of errors.
Panko & Ordway (2005)
Despite being staggeringly error prone, spreadsheets are a highly flexible programming environment.
Abreu, et al (2015)

Spreadsheet bibliography

Title An empirical study of spreadsheet error-finding performance
Authors Dennis Galletta, Dolphy Abraham, Mohamed El Louadi, William Lekse, Yannis A. Pollalis, & Jeffrey L. Sampler
Year 1993
Type Article
Publication Accounting, Management and Information Technologies
Series Volume 3, Number 2, April-June, pages 79-95
Abstract

Several well-founded concerns exist about the integrity and validity of electronic spreadsheets. Thirty CPAs and 30 MBA students volunteered to seek up to two errors planted in each of six spreadsheets to discover if expertise in the domain of accounting and the spreadsheet program would facilitate error-finding performance.

Subjects only found, on average, about 55% of the simple, conspicuous errors on the small spreadsheets.

As expected, both accounting and spreadsheeting expertise contributed to the subjects' error-finding rate, and those who performed this task with both types of expertise found the largest number of errors in the shortest time.

Interestingly, while CPAs were more accurate than non-CPAs in finding accounting-related errors, spreadsheet experts did not outperform novices in finding spreadsheet formula errors. Also, while spreadsheet expertise contributed to greater speed, accounting expertise did not.

Future research would further investigate the contribution of spreadsheet expertise to the error-finding task. Practitioners should be aware of the difficulties in finding even simple errors, and develop training programs to facilitate spreadsheet auditors' performance.

Full version Available
Sample
Mean number of errors found
Mean number of errors found

CPAs out-performed non-CPAs, but not by much. CPAs found only 61% of the spreadsheet errors, compared with 50% for the non-CPAs.

Experts found 57% of the errors, only slightly more than the 55% found by spreadsheet novices. The difference is not significant.

Go to top